From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 21 12:44:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA4F16A4B3 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:44:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Valuedj.com (adsl-216-100-130-20.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.100.130.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F048743F75 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:44:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from whizkid@valuedj.com) Received: from www.valuedj.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by Valuedj.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F130C9CC; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:36:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 208.253.246.93 (proxying for unknown) (SquirrelMail authenticated user whizkid) by www.valuedj.com with HTTP; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:36:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <65118.208.253.246.93.1066754164.squirrel@www.valuedj.com> In-Reply-To: <20031021084252.GC92274@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <10690.208.253.246.93.1066684927.squirrel@www.valuedj.com> <20031021084252.GC92274@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:36:04 -0400 (EDT) From: whizkid@valuedj.com To: "Matthew Seaman" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: whizkid@valuedj.com Subject: Re: Noob FreeBSD 5.1 install question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:44:29 -0000 > Well, there's no law that says you *have* to use the ports system, but > it's pretty strange not to take advantage of something so good... > There are pre-compiled packages available, but these generally don't > track the latest upstream updates to the ported software very > efficiently. The ports tree does: updates to popular packages like > apache generally go into the ports tree within a day or so of them > being published. > > Rather than installing the ports and system sources by downloading > tarballs from the FTP sites, there are arguments in favour of > installing by running cvsup(1) to populate an empty directory. Sorry, what i was saying is that instead of installing the PORTS from the cd I was downloading the latest and greatest ports Tarball from the www.freebsd.org/ports site. Not the fact that I don't use them.. But thank you for the valuable info. I will put it in my book so I can remember to use it tonight.