From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 4 08:50:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9F3106566C for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 08:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C221E8FC12 for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 08:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o448o4XR035841 for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 08:50:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o448o4ov035829; Tue, 4 May 2010 08:50:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 08:50:04 GMT Message-Id: <201005040850.o448o4ov035829@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Andrew Reilly Cc: Subject: Re: ports/143200: port graphics/sane-backends (snapscan) doesn't like new libusb device syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andrew Reilly List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 08:50:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/143200; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrew Reilly To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, areilly@bigpond.net.au Cc: Subject: Re: ports/143200: port graphics/sane-backends (snapscan) doesn't like new libusb device syntax Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 18:41:26 +1000 Any chance of this patch being committed, perhaps #if FreeBSD_Version >= 9000000 or whatever, if the old usb dev still matches? Cheers, -- Andrew