From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Dec 4 4:33:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B4437B401 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 04:33:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from monster.filearena.net (monster.filearena.net [202.6.159.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABC043EA9 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 04:33:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bastill@adam.com.au) Received: from lightning.adam.com.au (lightning.adam.com.au [203.2.124.20]) by monster.filearena.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with SMTP id gB4CXMbT091984 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 23:03:23 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from bastill@adam.com.au) Received: (qmail 29190 invoked by uid 65534); 4 Dec 2002 12:33:18 -0000 Received: from 202.6.144.21 ( [202.6.144.21]) as user bastill@mail.adam.com.au by webmail.adam.com.au with HTTP; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 23:03:18 +1030 Message-ID: <1039005198.3dedf60eac340@webmail.adam.com.au> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 23:03:18 +1030 From: bastill@adam.com.au To: Christopher Rosado Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: microuptime went backwards ?? References: <5.1.1.6.2.20021203163612.02025f98@mail.infomaniak.ch> <5.1.1.6.2.20021203163612.02025f98@mail.infomaniak.ch> <5.1.1.6.2.20021203191529.02036ed0@mail.infomaniak.ch> <1038975110.3ded8086e5dec@webmail.adam.com.au> <20021203214649.65e05160.rbg@gayteenresource.org> In-Reply-To: <20021203214649.65e05160.rbg@gayteenresource.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs X-Originating-IP: 202.6.144.21 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quoting Christopher Rosado : > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:41:50 +1030 > bastill@adam.com.au wrote: > > BCA> Makes no difference. As Greg Lehey explained earlier the only > BCA> solution is to delete all reference to APM in your kernel config file. > > He did? I see no such message from him in this thread. > > BCA> "Disabled" means "still there but not being used". > > Funnily enough, commenting it out in the kernel config certainly removes APM > support from the kernel... thus _disabling_ that particular feature. > > BCA> What we want is NOT PRESENT in any shape or form. > > Again, merely commenting it out of the config is sufficient, though > completely removing it from the config serves the same purpose. OK - do it your way. It won't work, but YOU will be right. Well done. Regards, Brian ----------------------------------------------- This message sent through Adam Internet Webmail http://www.adam.com.au To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message