From owner-freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 10:03:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B0816A4CE for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:03:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FC243D1D for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:03:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from daleco.biz ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:04:00 -0600 Message-ID: <402D1143.7060502@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:02:43 -0600 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040212 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jfm@blueyonder.co.uk References: <012e01c3f231$c87a3f80$bf7ba8c0@stf.nus.edu.sg> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Feb 2004 18:04:01.0046 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2314360:01C3F25B] cc: stormjumper@myrealbox.com cc: newbies@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how does one upgrade from 4.8 to 4.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Gathering place for new users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:03:52 -0000 John Murphy wrote: >"stormjumper" wrote: > > > >>hi everyone, >> >>I'm running FreeBSD 4.8 at the moment, just wondering if someone can point >>me to a relevant web-page take explains the process of upgrading to a >>different version clearly. >> >> > >See http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.9R/relnotes-i386.html#UPGRADE > >Which explains that there are two ways, binary or source. It also mentions >that you read /usr/src/UPDATING (when you have the new sources) as well. > > > >>Is there an issue if i "skip" versions, say from 4.4 to 4.9? or 4.8 to 5.2, >>the RELEASE issues notwithstanding? >> >> > >4.4 to 4.9 should be straightforward but 4.8 to 5.2 would be harder, but all >possible issues are usually well covered in /usr/src/UPDATING. > > > And 4.X to 5.X is recommended *against* by some users/community members. A dump of your data and a fresh install is better, they say. Part of the reason is so that you have opportunity to switch to ufs2 filesystems; the rest, I'm not sure about. Kevin Kinsey