From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 21 21:27:44 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D8A16A475
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:27:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECA313C4E1;
	Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:27:42 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <47950E4C.1030104@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:27:40 +0100
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: P Bielecki <pawciobiel@gmail.com>
References: <2e420cc20801200650q19ed0d03h38a3152b26f22643@mail.gmail.com>	
	<479375C0.30507@FreeBSD.org>
	<2e420cc20801210901k1e15fdep55b4829551114d50@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2e420cc20801210901k1e15fdep55b4829551114d50@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: packages with security vulnerabilities
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:27:44 -0000

P Bielecki wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2008 4:24 PM, Kris Kennaway <kris@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> Packages are built continuously and as fast as possible.  Which package
>> sets do you feel are being updated too slowly?
>>
>> Kris
>>
> 
> Kris,
> I am just curious how it works.
> Was concern about packages with security updates mostly;
> maybe perl, mod_perl, php5, Apache22 and possibly few from mail/ as
> well, what do you think?
> 
> I think I was trying to find analogy to Debian's security APT updates
> which actually haven't been using for quite a while now.

I still don't understand what you claim is the problem :)  We do not 
specially update packages like perl; rather, *every* package is 
frequently rebuilt and updated.

Kris