From owner-freebsd-net Sun Mar 19 8:33: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from databus.databus.com (databus.databus.com [198.186.154.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 214C737B67F for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 08:33:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barney@databus.databus.com) From: Barney Wolff To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 11:32 EST Subject: Re: RIP troubles Content-Length: 1381 Content-Type: text/plain Message-ID: <38d501390.6a9b@databus.databus.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well, ripv1 doesn't know about netmasks, assumes addresses are class-ful. Barney Wolff > Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 02:19:43 -0500 (EST) > From: Mike Nowlin > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: RIP troubles > Content-Length: 1047 > > > OK... I've been playing with routed/gated and RIP off and on for a couple > of months in the hope that it will help ease my suffering when it comes to > maintaining eight zillion routing entries on various machines. I keep > coming up with the same problem: > > (tcpdump grab) > 20:44:37.760592 tarkin.smlab.com.router > 192.168.2.255.router: rip-resp > 5: 192.168.2.0(1) core1-akron.raex.net(1) 208.132.36.0(1) 10.0.0.0(2) > 0.0.0.0(1) [ttl 1] (id 8214) > > The problem is that 10.0.0.0/8 route that keeps getting sent around. I > have several 10.x.0.0/16 and 10.x.y.0/24 routes being used, but the /8 is > what's being advertised... This is why I usually give up and do all the > routing manually. :( (There are no /8's defined, other than what RIP > puts into the routing tables.) > > I admit that my gut feeling is that I'm missing something stupid, but is > it possible that this is a "feature" of RIP? > > (BTW: I've tried both RIPv1 and RIPv2) > > --mike > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message