From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 28 10:42:27 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0294816A41F;
	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:42:27 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC8343D45;
	Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:42:26 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 6E4C130D3; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:42:25 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:42:25 -0500
To: Jean-Yves Lefort <jylefort@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20051028104225.GA17229@soaustin.net>
References: <200510280758.j9S7wSm9082813@repoman.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200510280758.j9S7wSm9082813@repoman.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/libid3tag Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
	ports/audio/libid3tag/files patch-Makefile.in patch-configure
	patch-ltmain.sh
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:42:27 -0000

On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 07:58:27AM +0000, Jean-Yves Lefort wrote:
>   - While here, fix library major version number

Which is the canonical example of 'sweeping change'.

The next slush cycle I expect us to do better on this.  I have on my list
of things to do to document much more specifically what these are, exactly,
but 'library major version number' I had hoped was well-understood as
being the case that would have been most clear.

mcl