From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 10:03:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FEDF16A41F; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:03:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr (postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E3143D46; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:03:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (vol75-8-82-233-239-98.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.239.98]) by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488EF3178DA; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:03:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 99CEF405A; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:03:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:03:49 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Gleb Smirnoff Message-ID: <20050819100349.GY659@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <200508181034.j7IAYUSS015059@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050818232116.GS659@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050819092219.GB57615@cell.sick.ru> <20050819094038.GV659@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050819094625.GD57615@cell.sick.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050819094625.GD57615@cell.sick.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Jeremie Le Hen , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:03:21 -0000 > J> This sysctl is definitely carp(4)-centric, this is underlined by its > J> name :-). I'm not sure why you don't want to put this is carp(4) > J> manpage. Is it to make easier the future imports of the carp(4) > J> subsystem from OpenBSD ? > > The people, looking for this sysctl, in most cases don't use CARP. > It'll be strange to search for the answer in manpage for facility, > that you don't use. Ok I understand, so I'd vote for the inet(4) manual page, what do you think about this ? Documentation people should have the correct answer, however. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >