Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:42:02 -0500
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Juha Saarinen <juhasaarinen@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Let's use gcc-4.2, not 4.1 -- OpenMP
Message-ID:  <20061215034201.GA4310@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <b34be8420612141915k50612a15ma6f7efe3816839e3@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20061213192150.CF83D16A417@hub.freebsd.org> <200612131711.50921.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <4580DFAB.3080601@FreeBSD.org> <200612140917.25523@aldan> <elrr0d$8g1$1@sea.gmane.org> <20061214183026.GA1532@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4581A3E3.9060807@samsco.org> <20061215015713.GA33730@dragon.NUXI.org> <45820F35.50802@samsco.org> <b34be8420612141915k50612a15ma6f7efe3816839e3@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 04:15:23PM +1300, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> So... silly question perhaps, but does -CURRENT (world + kernel) build
> with gcc 4.2 and -fopenmp? What about -STABLE and -RELEASE?

gcc 4.1 support requires changes to /usr/src (mostly to fix new
warnings and error conditions).  I don't know if gcc 4.2 is even
stricter.

Kris

--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFghmJWry0BWjoQKURAlb+AKD/MpBxDtlJSldldc60hm98W8O0zgCg7klH
IWVlW12pZ6IwauNRtlLjkrE=
=rzW+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061215034201.GA4310>