From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 08:40:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8690E16A404 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2C313C44C for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l2R8e9Vh045710 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:40:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l2R8e9Ph045709; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:40:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:40:09 GMT Message-Id: <200703270840.l2R8e9Ph045709@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Victor Sudakov Cc: Subject: Re: bin/110907: restore(8) cannot restore Solaris/SPARC ufsdumps any more X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Victor Sudakov List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:40:10 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/110907; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Victor Sudakov To: Remko Lodder Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, Maxim Konovalov Subject: Re: bin/110907: restore(8) cannot restore Solaris/SPARC ufsdumps any more Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 14:35:27 +0700 Remko Lodder wrote: > > > Synopsis: restore(8) cannot restore Solaris/SPARC ufsdumps any more > > > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > > > State-Changed-By: remko > > > State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 27 05:53:18 UTC 2007 > > > State-Changed-Why: > > > Hello, please ask around on the mailinglists first before submitting a > > > PRoblem Report, this is initially a question. Thanks for using FreeBSD > > > though. > > > > Since when is it a requirement? > > > > Do you mean to say I have missed some particular discussion on this > > topic, or does my PR not qualify as a PR? > > It had always been the case that the PR ticketing system is for determined > problems and not for vauge and possible explainable situations, ask around > on the questions list to get more info and if people confirm this is a bug > get back to me so that I can reopen the ticket. > > Till that time you are facing a user question / support question which is > -not- covered by GNATS (thus indeed the PR did not qualify as a PR). If bin/85011 qualified as a PR so should mine :) But of course, nobody needs duplicate PRs. Thanks Maxim! I will try restore from RELENG_5. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru