From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Sep 25 6:59:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1394E37B401 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 06:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from agape.wingnet.net (agape.wingnet.net [206.30.215.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720FE43E7B for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 06:59:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trevarthan@wingnet.net) Received: from david.int.wingnet.net (makrothumia.wingnet.net [206.30.215.5]) by agape.wingnet.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8PDxlks093964; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:59:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trevarthan@wingnet.net) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Matthias Trevarthan Reply-To: trevarthan@wingnet.net Organization: Urokosodoji, Inc. To: "Barry Byrne" , "Lowell Gilbert" Subject: Re: 4.6.2 filesystem efficiency Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:59:47 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200209250959.47310.trevarthan@wingnet.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Neat. Has anyone benchmarked this thing? Are there any reports that detai= l the=20 performance increase? (And the RAM increase, I'm guessing) On Wednesday 25 September 2002 09:49, Barry Byrne wrote: > Matthias: > > I think it was introduced in 4.4 but only enabled in the default kernel > from 4.5 onwards. At least that's what my kernel confs seem to indicate= =2E > > - Barry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message