Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 08:08:38 +0000 From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com> To: "tuexen@freebsd.org" <tuexen@freebsd.org>, Tom Jones <thj@freebsd.org> Cc: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>, Zhenlei Huang <zlei.huang@gmail.com>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Too aggressive TCP ACKs Message-ID: <PH0PR06MB76395048D836D4D19D03DC4686339@PH0PR06MB7639.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <701FC3D6-7AFE-46F6-977D-75CAD34646D4@freebsd.org> References: <75D35F36-7759-4168-ADBA-C2414F5B53BC@gmail.com> <712641B3-5196-40CC-9B64-04637F16F649@lurchi.franken.de> <62A0DD30-B3ED-48BE-9C01-146487599092@gmail.com> <0FED34A9-D093-442A-83B7-08C06D11F8B5@lurchi.franken.de> <330A9146-F7CC-4CAB-9003-2F90B872AC3E@gmail.com> <1ed66217-5463-fd4d-7e7a-58d9981bc44c@selasky.org> <Y1j2ZzHaFt/YA5Et@spacemonster> <4E92E238-798B-4293-B0D2-81E3FCB92E34@freebsd.org> <Y1kvNBMedJtrs6yo@spacemonster> <701FC3D6-7AFE-46F6-977D-75CAD34646D4@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>> It focuses on QUIC, but congestion control dynamics don't change >>>> with the protocol. You should be able to read there, but if not I'm >>>> happy to send anyone a pdf. >>> Is QUIC using an L=2 for ABC? >> >> I think that is the rfc recommendation, actual deployed reality is >> more scattershot. >Wouldn't that be relevant? If you get an ack for, let's say 8 packets, you would only increment (in slow start) the cwnd by 2 packets, not 8? > >Best regards >Michael Isn't that the optimization in Linux with QuickAck during the periods, where the data receiver assumes, that the sender is still in SlowStart - and acking every packet? Richard
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?PH0PR06MB76395048D836D4D19D03DC4686339>