From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 5 17:21:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEC816A41F for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 17:21:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from viefep20-int.chello.at (viefep12-int.chello.at [213.46.255.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E047943D58 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 17:21:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from wombat.fafoe.narf.at ([213.47.85.26]) by viefep20-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20050805172111.EVFH25440.viefep20-int.chello.at@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 19:21:11 +0200 Received: by wombat.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DE6512C7; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 19:21:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 19:21:10 +0200 From: Stefan Farfeleder To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050805172108.GE632@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> References: <20050803200143.GA70735@crodrigues.org> <200508051049.26158.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20050805162234.GA96585@crodrigues.org> <200508051307.19261.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200508051307.19261.jhb@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: [RFC] Kernel patches for compilation with gcc 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 17:21:18 -0000 On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 01:07:18PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > Ok, given that, I'd rather remove -Wredundant_decls than break perfectly legal > code. It would be nice if there was a -Wredundant_decls_that_actually_works Seconded.