From owner-cvs-all  Tue Mar 19 12:18:32 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.92.13.169])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 14D6737B4ED; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 12:15:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2JKFclv015476;
	Tue, 19 Mar 2002 12:15:38 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g2JKELMM015454;
	Tue, 19 Mar 2002 12:14:21 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 12:14:21 -0800
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
Cc: Guy Helmer <ghelmer@palisadesys.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd Makefile
Message-ID: <20020319121421.A15380@dragon.nuxi.com>
Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>,
	Guy Helmer <ghelmer@palisadesys.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203191253290.12151-100000@magellan.palisadesys.com> <018101c1cf7f$86f601b0$d800a8c0@dwcjr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <018101c1cf7f$86f601b0$d800a8c0@dwcjr>; from dwcjr@inethouston.net on Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 01:51:57PM -0600
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 01:51:57PM -0600, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> > > Basically the portable would require less hacking to run on freebsd.
> They
> > > are Both from OpenBSD so there shouldn't be any disadvantage.
> >
> > The "portable" openssh contains extra code to support other non-BSD O/S's.
> > To me, this implies the portable openssh contains code we don't need and
> > it may have security implications.  I see this as a disadvantage.
> 
> You could also argue that it also contains extra code for other BSD O/S's
> that OpenBSD does not need.

Examples please, not empty conjectures.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message