Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:39:14 +0300 From: "Andrew W. Nosenko" <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Stefan Walter <stefan@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: libxul dumps core with 'illegal hardware instruction' with newly ported 'pytrainer' Message-ID: <BANLkTimSNqHDoPt6kuG1zoF6QGjcXRZX-Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110405070656.GA1490@birne.dunkelkammer.void> References: <20110405070656.GA1490@birne.dunkelkammer.void>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:06, Stefan Walter <stefan@freebsd.org> wrote: > (I didn't get any replies on freebsd-gecko@, so I thought I'd just send it > on freebsd-ports@, too.) > > Hi, > > I'm working on a port for pytrainer (see [1]), which uses libxul to > display GPS tracks via Google Maps or OSM. Starting the software, it > crashes with "illegal hardware instruction" and leaves a core dump behind. Something compiled for CPU model higher than CPU, which actually run the resulting binary? For example, if I compile with -march=native on the Core2 machine and then try to run resulting binary on Pentium4, then I will obtain "Illegal Instruction" with very high probability. -- Andrew W. Nosenko <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTimSNqHDoPt6kuG1zoF6QGjcXRZX-Q>