From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 6 03:36:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D31016A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 03:36:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D4743D46 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 03:36:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) i963ahq79017; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 20:36:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 20:36:43 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200410052314.30597.m.hauber@mchsi.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Multifunction printer/scanner/copier recommendation needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 03:36:46 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Mike Hauber > Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 8:15 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Multifunction printer/scanner/copier recommendation needed > > > Has _anyone_ out there found an exception to this? I'd be > interested to know. > > Is it that the hardware _must_ be software driven (in > addition to the drivers)? Is it a problem with the > structure of the drivers themselves? What gives? > The companies that make multifunction units are really in the business to make a quick buck. The only way they can do this is to produce the units dirt-cheap then only produce just enough support so that people don't get pissed at the units and return them to the store right after purchasing them. This isn't hard as the target market for these devices are the small home office people who are, in a word, cheapskates, who don't care about long term ROI. They just want a cheap $99 multifunction device and if it breaks in a year they figure they will just landfill it and get another one on sale. These devices have terrible support even within Windows. Lots of people bought Canon multifunction fax/scanner/printers a couple years ago then found no Windows XP drivers were forthcoming when Windows XP was released. The multifunction devices selling today aren't going to be supported past Windows 2003 either. There's lots and lots of retired office equipment out there that is fantastic, plain paper faxes, laser printers, photocopiers, etc. Sure you may have to drop $100 on a new toner cartridge and a fuser when you buy it - but it's going to last a home office's printing needs another decade at the rate they print paper. > I ask because when people ask me, all I can relate is what > I've experienced, and I can't give them an explanation > other than, "Multi-function products bite." > Cheap office equipment bites, period. If your going to work at home, spend the dough for decent gear. Why turn your home office into a nightmare of cheap crap? It always amazes me that people setting up a home office will buy a $25 chair from Target that will fall apart in a year and feels like sitting on a board, when they can go to a used office dealer and get a used commercial chair that sold for $250 new, for about $50, and won't kill their lower back. Ted