From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 28 16:52:57 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 21F0616A4CE; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:52:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3629C43D1F; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:52:56 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si)
Received: from localhost (patsy.ijs.si [193.2.4.8])
	by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20A61DD544;
	Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:52:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([193.2.4.24])
 by localhost (patsy.ijs.si [193.2.4.8]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 45108-01-8; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:52:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33])
	by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AB41DD53D;
	Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:52:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.ijs.si (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1])
	by idefix.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC675C32;
	Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:52:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:52:49 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
References: <200503270049.j2R0nrWq098656@8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200503270049.j2R0nrWq098656@8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200503281852.50193.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si
cc: x11@FreeBSD.org
cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS
X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support <freebsd-x11.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:52:57 -0000

On Sunday 27 of March 2005 01:49, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Dear port maintainers,
>
> The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
> LATEST_LINK values.  They should either be modified to use a unique
> LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
> each other in the packages/Latest directory.  If your ports conflict with
> ports maintained by another person, please coordinate your efforts with
> them.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kris "Annoying Reminder Guy II" Kennaway
> LATEST_LINK          PORTNAME                       MAINTAINER
> ==========================================================================
[snip]
> imake                devel/imake-4                  x11@FreeBSD.org
> imake                devel/imake-6                  x11@FreeBSD.org
[snip]

So this won't work:
On Monday 21 of February 2005 02:44, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Should the NO_LATEST_LINK in devel/imake-6 be removed?  It's not going
> to conflict with imake-4 since only one of those packages is built on
> any given branch.

Should we wrap this in some X_WINDOW_SYSTEM if-check like this (for imake-6):
.if ${X_WINDOW_SYSTEM} != xorg
NO_LATEST_LINK=
.endif


Dejan