Date: 20 Dec 2002 12:33:49 +0530 From: Sid Carter <sidcarter@symonds.net> To: ports@freebsd.org Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thoughts about ports freeze Message-ID: <86lm2l5fze.fsf@tango.in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <HqONuVcBJF@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <20021220001529.GC9963@vega.vega.com> <HqONuVcBJF@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 07:51:48 +0100, dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) said:
Dirk> Maxim Sobolev wrote,
>> Perhaps we could just branch out current state of the tree and unlock
>> it for normal use, while allow to commit onto the RE branch only after
Dirk> Moving the tags can give us fine control withouth having to branch or freeze.
Dirk> I have 29 updates/committs in the queue, waiting for the freeze is over.
Dirk> No offense, I know the problems, but I think the freeze is way to long.
Hi,
While we are on this topic, what happens after 5.0-CURRENT ? I
understand 5.0-RELEASE, but on the -CURRENT front ? Will we have to wait
till the release for the unfreeze to happen. Cause, the way it is going,
it seems as tho' the freeze is gonna stay till the 2nd quarter of 2003
or something. Just my thougts, no offense meant :)
Regards
Sid
--
Where there's a will, there's an Inheritance Tax.
Sid Carter - http://khader.net/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86lm2l5fze.fsf>