From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Dec 4 18:54: 7 2000 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 4 18:54:05 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (iclub.nsu.ru [193.124.222.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C236E37B400 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 18:54:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eB52roE80083; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:53:50 +0600 (NS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 08:53:50 +0600 (NS) From: Max Khon To: Will Andrews Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "mortal" mount In-Reply-To: <20001204181357.R570@puck.firepipe.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, there! On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Will Andrews wrote: > I spotted this PR in the database today: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=11031 > > I'd like to know: why can't our mount optionally allow configuration of > non-root mounting to a fixed mountpoint? This patch (obviously, it will > need to be updated to sync with the current tree) seems fairly > straightforward and its style matches the current tree pretty well. > > I don't see any reason not to put it in the tree. what's wrong with 'sysctl -w vfs.usermount=1'? /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message