From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 1 20:43:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6511065691; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 20:43:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752738FC14; Mon, 1 Jun 2009 20:43:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from gate.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.123] helo=h30.sp.ipt.ru) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1MBELa-000O9t-Vc; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:43:06 +0400 To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org References: <4A242BF1.9050202@FreeBSD.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:43:06 +0400 In-Reply-To: <4A242BF1.9050202@FreeBSD.org> (Greg Larkin's message of "Mon\, 01 Jun 2009 15\:28\:49 -0400") Message-ID: <22672149@h30.sp.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fix for CONFLICTS in emulators/linux_base ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:43:10 -0000 (Seems I've got this mail by private email and send an answer. but for archieves I'll duplicate it here.) On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:28:49 -0400 Greg Larkin wrote: > Hi emulation team, > I'm working on a PR for graphics/linux-ac3d, and it required me to > upgrade my linux_base-fc-4_14 package. I noticed that the newer > linux_base-f ports don't include the correct package name in CONFLICTS > for the older port. Thanks for taking care of it. I should have done it myself but you know there are always other first-aid-things to do... :-( > I have included a patch for the ports that you maintain. Please review > it when you have a moment and let me know what you think. > http://people.freebsd.org/~glarkin/diffs/bsam-linux_base.diff Some thoughts: . I'm not sure if names without * can match anything (and anyway if they do, ex. linux_base-fc will match linux_base-fc6, the third diff); . there are more linux_base ports now (including linux_base-f9, linux_base-f10). They should be included into CONFLICTS and their CONFLICTS should be considered either. Thanks once more! WBR -- bsam