From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 2 15:09:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44426106566B; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 15:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mx1.bjare.net (mx1.bjare.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FBD8FC08; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 15:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5BF5E18E; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 17:08:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.bjare.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.626 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.626 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.628, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.596] Received: from mx1.bjare.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.bjare.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id DTo9zC+H7KLV; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 17:08:32 +0200 (CEST) X-BN-MX1: ja X-BN-MailInfo: BjareNet Received: from bsdpc01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-041-102.ekt.thalamus.net [195.216.41.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.bjare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 887B75E167; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 17:08:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FCA2CAE.6020809@eskk.nu> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 17:09:34 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dougb@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Portmaster and update progress, suggestion. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:09:37 -0000 I'm thinking about some kind of information on the build progress when one does larger updates like the newly recommendation in /usr/ports/UPDATING portmaster -r png- I myself have three machines with different capacity when it comes to building ports. How about a knobb one could choose that would give information after finishing building one port and before beginning on the next one, that would be something like: finishing foo port xx ports remaining or something in that order. At least it would informative for me to get an idea of how far in the process the machine is. Thanks /Leslie