From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 15 18:10:35 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC2A10656A5
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 15 Sep 2010 18:10:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de)
Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930F08FC2D
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 15 Sep 2010 18:10:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id 6F16C1E00974; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:10:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from triton8.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8FI8eCr035650;
	Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:08:40 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from nox@triton8.kn-bremen.de)
Received: (from nox@localhost)
	by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id o8FI8boE035649;
	Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:08:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox)
From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:08:37 +0200
To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
Message-ID: <20100915180837.GC34329@triton8.kn-bremen.de>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1007052053090.9243@wonkity.com>
	<20100706032057.GA15827@stlux503.dsto.defence.gov.au>
	<201009022024.o82KOVni007042@triton8.kn-bremen.de>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1009081918340.25377@wonkity.com>
	<20100911184519.GA2100@triton8.kn-bremen.de>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1009111302590.62686@wonkity.com>
	<20100913211401.GA49701@triton8.kn-bremen.de>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1009141248370.54151@wonkity.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1009141248370.54151@wonkity.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
Subject: Re: CFT: vdfuse port (was: Re: Mounting VirtualBox vdi files
 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED])
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 18:10:35 -0000

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 01:00:19PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
>[...]
> In any case, I'd rather have a port that is not 100% than no port at 
> all.  Announcing possible problems in the pkg-message would be 
> appropriate.

Well if we can establish that readonly works consistently at least
for `some' versions of FreeBSD then that might be an option.

 Thanx,
	Juergen