From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 16 21:36:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D18016A4A0 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 21:36:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from thin.berklix.org (thin.berklix.org [194.246.123.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD5643DA4 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 21:35:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from js.berklix.net (p549A57B2.dip.t-dialin.net [84.154.87.178]) (authenticated bits=128) by thin.berklix.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8GLZiC3070726 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:35:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from fire.jhs.private (fire.jhs.private [192.168.91.41]) by js.berklix.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8GLZlPe002671 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:35:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net) Received: from fire.jhs.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.jhs.private (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8GLZkiO081098 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:35:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.jhs.private) Message-Id: <200609162135.k8GLZkiO081098@fire.jhs.private> To: stable@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <200609162012.k8GKCi3x080193@fire.jhs.private> References: <20060916193420.GA15647@xor.obsecurity.org> <200609162012.k8GKCi3x080193@fire.jhs.private> Comments: In-reply-to "Julian H. Stacey" message dated "Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:12:44 +0200." Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 23:35:46 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: Subject: Re: Attention Julian Stacey X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 21:36:45 -0000 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > You are refusing personal email. This is a bit antisocial since it > > leaves me no way to reply privately to your email. > > Hi Kris, > Huh ? Some mistake. No intent to block, except the usual list of > spam domains & phrases get filtered. Maybe something got wrongly > listed there though. But I have had problems a while back, & been > reconfiging lots of things, inc named etc last few days. Wasn't > aware anyone inconvenienced, sorry if so. Please private mail max > info on nature of the block you see & I'll try to solve it. I'll > private mail you (don't want 'em in list archive :-) > some addresses you can use to send the debug of the blockage you > see & I'm unaware of. > Cheers. That mail routed through mu.org which is listed as a spam domain here, so my SMTP issued "Access denied http://berklix.com/~jhs/phone/" (To rescue the occasional non spammer that might inadvertently get caught). I dont keep records of each spam that causes each domain to be added to the spam list. Looking at mu.org To see what it is: http://www.mu.org/ features a female nude. Tableware, Hosting for christians & hodge podge of strange domain names - I wouldn't be suprised if spammers had lurked @ mu.org. Not a tight unified ship. nslookup doesn't show an MX for obsecurity.org @ mu.org, but mu.org was an uplink on Dyn-DNS from kris@obsecurity. Whois lists Paul Saab, not a name I know. I don't use external RBL services, so don't know if public RBLs block mu.org ? -- Julian Stacey. BSD Unix C Net Consultancy, Munich/Muenchen http://berklix.com Mail Ascii, not HTML. Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz. Don't buy it ! Get it free ! http://berklix.org/free-software