From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 20:10:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838BA16A41C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:10:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F1E43D4C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:10:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.222.227] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1Ddw17-000Isq-M7; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:10:14 -0600 In-Reply-To: <200506021303.21936.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> References: <0a6397740f09ea4ac7cce0b1bead3bde@chrononomicon.com> <08B46D9B-5FC0-4924-B287-2634268DF1A3@shire.net> <4ee98be1fb4890e46b1d7b3263d0e98d@chrononomicon.com> <200506021303.21936.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <55C787E4-B2C1-452E-B0BE-797C864673F6@shire.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:10:12 -0600 To: Vizion X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.222.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on hobbiton.shire.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Mon May 30 00:43:02 MDT 2005) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on hobbiton.shire.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Bart Silverstrim Subject: Re: postgrey question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 20:10:15 -0000 On Jun 2, 2005, at 2:03 PM, Vizion wrote: > I do not know I buy that argument. The way I see it as a user of > this list - > it ain't broken as far as I am concerned and so I'd rather it not > be fixed. > My feeling is that you would be doing people a bigger favor by > letting them > sort out their own junk mail problem. It is not a listserver's job > to fix it. > It is up to the user/isp combination to fix. > nobody was talking about the list or siggesting changing this or any other list. This was a how to get postfix to do greylisting with postgrey on freebsd question. I just brought up the point that greylisting itself is not a panacea and works better in conjunction with something like spam assassin to only grey list suspected spam. Whitelisting btw does not solve the user's problems of perception Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad@shire.net