Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:01:27 -0500
From:      Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org>
To:        Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>
Cc:        peter.blok@bsd4all.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: crash in iflib_fast_intr
Message-ID:  <20170119200127.eo2fqaxx7gt7hwgx@mutt-hardenedbsd>
In-Reply-To: <20170118194534.47vcuas7jllvw3o6@mutt-hardenedbsd>
References:  <0D6E88B3-6EB8-428F-B116-40D304CD74E5@bsd4all.org> <132b9c54-26dd-c57d-2fbb-58f8f9b256b0@freebsd.org> <20170118194534.47vcuas7jllvw3o6@mutt-hardenedbsd>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--jut27mh3kgqfpavt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 02:45:34PM -0500, Shawn Webb wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 07:31:12AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> >=20
> >=20
> > On 01/18/17 03:37, peter.blok@bsd4all.org wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >=20
> > > A kernel without option EARLY_AP_STARTUP crashes in if lib_fast_intr.=
 Since GENERIC now has EARLY_AP_STARTUP, this probably got unnoticed. Probl=
em is reproducible.
> > >=20
> > > KDB: stack backtrace:
> > > #0 0xffffffff805cec97 at kdb_backtrace+0x67
> > > #1 0xffffffff80584816 at vpanic+0x186
> > > #2 0xffffffff80584683 at panic+0x43
> > > #3 0xffffffff8090f222 at trap_fatal+0x322
> > > #4 0xffffffff8090f3ec at trap_pfault+0x1bc
> > > #5 0xffffffff8090eaa0 at trap+0x280
> > > #6 0xffffffff808f35e1 at calltrap+0x8
> > > #7 0xffffffff806a202d at iflib_fast_intr+0x3d
> > > #8 0xffffffff8054963b at intr_event_handle+0x9b
> > > #9 0xffffffff80965f38 at intr_execute_handlers+0x48
> > > #10 0xffffffff8096b1cf at lapic_handle_intr+0x3f
> > > #11 0xffffffff808f3cc7 at Xapic_isr1+0xb7
> > > #12 0xffffffff805b994a at sched_idletd+0x37a
> > > #13 0xffffffff805460f5 at fork_exit+0x85
> > > #14 0xffffffff808f3b1e at fork_trampoline+0xe
> > >=20
> > > Peter
> >=20
> > Thanks for the report.  We're looking at this.
> >=20
> > This is with an igb(4) interface or em(4)?
> >=20
> > sean
> >=20
>=20
> I'm getting something similar with em(4):
>=20
> https://goo.gl/photos/MXiFXtatBYcWagJTA
>=20
> I'm at this commit in HardenedBSD:
>=20
> https://github.com/HardenedBSD/hardenedBSD/commit/2108b0d56984115eb52e72b=
d16539071064b348e

r312434 fixes this for me. Thanks a lot for the quick turnaround!

--=20
Shawn Webb
Cofounder and Security Engineer
HardenedBSD

GPG Key ID:          0x6A84658F52456EEE
GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89  3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE

--jut27mh3kgqfpavt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=h9VC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jut27mh3kgqfpavt--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170119200127.eo2fqaxx7gt7hwgx>