From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 11 10:37:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D792F8D for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 10:37:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toshi@ruby.ocn.ne.jp) Received: from msgw001-04.ocn.ad.jp (msgw001-04.ocn.ad.jp [180.37.203.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05922E82 for ; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 10:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (p6200-ipngn100102sizuokaden.shizuoka.ocn.ne.jp [180.51.189.200]) by msgw001-04.ocn.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F3E833E92; Sun, 11 Aug 2013 19:37:42 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 19:37:40 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20130811.193740.226802057.toshi@ruby.ocn.ne.jp> To: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HS isochronous transfer on musb_otg From: SAITOU Toshihide In-Reply-To: <20130808.220939.219630261.toshi@ruby.ocn.ne.jp> References: <20130807.210258.112628314.toshi@ruby.ocn.ne.jp> <5202502D.20702@bitfrost.no> <20130808.220939.219630261.toshi@ruby.ocn.ne.jp> Received-SPF: pass (mfgw216.ocn.ad.jp: domain of ruby.ocn.ne.jp designates 180.37.203.80 as permitted sender) client-ip=180.37.203.80; envelope-from=toshi@ruby.ocn.ne.jp; helo=msgw002-05.ocn.ad.jp; X-GPG-fingerprint: 34B3 0B6A 8520 F5B0 EBC7 69F6 C055 9F8A 0D49 F8FC X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 10:37:50 -0000 In message: <20130808.220939.219630261.toshi@ruby.ocn.ne.jp> SAITOU Toshihide writes: > I have confirmed the scattering is fixed by modifying the > mustbotg_host_data_rx(), althought the modification I have > made breaks other transfer type at the moment. This is a Logitec C920 and realize that the only device that is working among I have tried. SAITOU Toshihide