From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jun  8 14:02:20 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA28223
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jun 1995 14:02:20 -0700
Received: from penzance.econ.yale.edu (root@penzance.econ.yale.edu [130.132.32.100])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id OAA28215
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 1995 14:02:14 -0700
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 17:02:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: -Vince- <vince@penzance.econ.yale.edu>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>
cc: - PiT - <pit@mail.nws.orst.edu>, Jaime Bozza <wheelman@max.tiac.net>,
        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.0.5 Problems 
In-Reply-To: <7491.802606659@freefall.cdrom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.950608165951.8673K-100000@penzance.econ.yale.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 8 Jun 1995, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:

> > 	Hmmm, the installation never did use the root.flp but only the 
> > boot.flp. 
> 
> It fetches root.flp from wherever you got the rest of the bits.
> I'll check to see if there's a sync problem somewhere.
>

	Oh okay...
 
> > 	I don't know but I remember someone reporting the same problem.  
> > In the disklabel thing, it put wd0s0 before the other FreeBSD slices so 
> > that's what happened in /etc/fstab
> 
> No, the order it shows in disklabel has _NOTHING_ to do with the
> order in /etc/fstab!  Like I said, it's sorted so /usr/dos1 should
> go after /usr.

	Hmmm, I guess somehow it is writing the /etc/fstab wrong then 
since the /dev name for the dos slice is before the FreeBSD slices and it 
just put all the slices in the order /dev is in...


Cheers,
-Vince- vince@kbrown.oldcampus.yale.edu - GUS Mailing Lists Admin
UCLA Physics/Electrical Engineering - UC Berkeley Fall '95
SysAdmin bigbang.HIP.Berkeley.EDU - Running FreeBSD, Real UN*X for Free!