Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:20:08 GMT
From:      Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/90312: [patch] www/mod_perl2: added support for www/apache22
Message-ID:  <200512131220.jBDCK8s4072536@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/90312; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@netlab.nec.de>
To: =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?=8Aimun_Mikecin?= <simun.mikecin@logos.hr>
Cc: <bug-followup@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ports/90312: [patch] www/mod_perl2: added support for www/apache22
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:13:23 +0100

 On Dec 13, 2005, at 12:51, =8Aimun Mikecin wrote:
 > Just like the maintainership of the port does not mean you will =20
 > *always*
 > take care of bugfixing, updating and resolving problems, I cannot be a
 > tester whenever you make a change. Port maintanership is based on =20
 > doing
 > it on best-effort basis as time permits, so is my help with testing.
 > Nobody is paid to do it.
 
 I am well aware of what port maintainership entails.
 
 > Beside maintaining a few ports, I do testing
 > for other maintainers in the environment they cant do the testing
 > themself. It is usually testing on different hardware or different
 > architecture.
 
 Hence my question if you were wiling to do the same for mod_perl2. =20
 Apparently, you aren't, which is fine of course.
 
 > It would be a very bad thing for them to have an attitude
 > to refuse to support other architectures just because they can test it
 > only on (for example) i386.
 
 I'm not refusing anything. I'm pointing out that adding support for =20
 configurations I can't test may create problems, because people will =20
 expect those configurations to work when I cannot test them.
 
 I'm open for constructive suggestions on how to deal with this. One =20
 way would be someone that can test these configurations and provide =20
 feedback. Another - worse - way is to temporarily disable those =20
 configurations, to avoid violating POLA ("well, it compiled, so it =20
 must run correctly, too").
 
 Lars
 --
 Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories
 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200512131220.jBDCK8s4072536>