From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 29 10:51:33 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB5537B404
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vsmtp3.tin.it (vsmtp3.tin.it [212.216.176.223])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9A843F85
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from flag@tin.it)
Received: from newluxor.skynet.org (80.182.24.132) by vsmtp3.tin.it (7.0.019)
	id 3F16C22A003EE6BD for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG;
	Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:51:30 +0200
Received: by newluxor.skynet.org (Postfix, from userid 1002)
	id 73FD68C; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:53:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:53:12 +0200
From: Paolo Pisati <flag@libero.it>
To: FreeBSD_Net <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-ID: <20030729175312.GA2266@newluxor.skynet.org>
References: <20030729161225.GA231@newluxor.skynet.org>
	<Pine.BSF.4.21.0307290957410.8223-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0307290957410.8223-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Useless-Header: Look ma, it's a # sign! 
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD newluxor.skynet.org 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE 
Subject: Re: Differences between netgraph nodes in 4.x and 5.x
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:51:34 -0000

On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 09:59:14AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> The fix in this case would be for the ether node to not allow this ti
> happen..
> this requires a few small changes..
>  The error codes must exist in sys/errno.h
> I try select one that is closest in spirit :-)

maybe:

#define EISCONN         56              /* Socket is already connected */

or

#define ECONNREFUSED    61              /* Connection refused */

but anyway it's not vital anymore, now i that know i won't make
the same mistake again... =)

but it seems that there's another problem now,
while loading the nodes, that freeze my box...

-- 

Paolo

GUFI: http://www.gufi.org