From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 22:20:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A3B16A400 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:20:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676DE13C44C for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:20:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l3PMKI92063952 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:20:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l3PMKIup063951; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:20:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:20:18 GMT Message-Id: <200704252220.l3PMKIup063951@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Gavin Atkinson Cc: Subject: Re: misc/99643: request to remove src/tools/tools/portsinfo because it's obsolete and not needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gavin Atkinson List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:20:18 -0000 The following reply was made to PR misc/99643; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gavin Atkinson To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, novel@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: misc/99643: request to remove src/tools/tools/portsinfo because it's obsolete and not needed Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:44:28 +0100 This seems sensible. It relied on code in www/en/cgi/ports.cgi removed in revision 1.84, in November 2005. In turn, that code was removed because INDEX files are no longer regularly rebuilt in CVS, which is unlikely to change. Although it's probably fixable by modifying the way ports.cgi works, as nobody seems to have noticed that this script hasn't worked for 18 months, there doesn't seem much point.