From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Jul 17 13:47:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B8DD7FAB1 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 13:47:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: from mx.irealone.hr (xoth.irealone.hr [136.243.79.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4F17205C for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 13:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: by mx.irealone.hr (Postfix, from userid 58) id 14AB67626; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:47:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on postfix.xoth.irealone.hr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from mail.irealone.com (unknown [10.0.0.10]) by mx.irealone.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5DE7622 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:47:08 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:47:08 +0200 From: "Vlad K." To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stack_guard hardening bsdinstall option in STABLE and 11.1 Organization: Acheron Media In-Reply-To: <20170717133359.GP16843@FreeBSD.org> References: <20170717133359.GP16843@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <61f79801976fab6770471cd3e2359652@acheronmedia.com> X-Sender: vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 13:47:14 -0000 On 2017-07-17 15:33, Glen Barber wrote: > > No, this is not available in the 11.1 installer. > > Glen Thanks but that's why I asked why's that. r320674 said MFC after 1 day. Is it too late for 11.1-RELEASE, so it'll be applied to 11-STABLE, or is there another reason? If its' too late, does that mean it's too late for the installer, but the new stack_guard code is there in STABLE and I am guessing will be part of 11.1, so we can assume the sysctl to be an integer (as opposed to enable/disable semantics of the sysctl in 11.0)? In other words, is it safe to ramp up the gap size in 11.1? -- Vlad K.