From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri May 16 12:06:16 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA13912 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 16 May 1997 12:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fps.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA13903 for ; Fri, 16 May 1997 12:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost by fps.biblos.unal.edu.co (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA21112; Fri, 16 May 1997 14:05:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 14:05:04 -0500 (EST) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" To: Terry Lambert Cc: Ben Black , thorpej@nas.nasa.gov, rminnich@sarnoff.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cluster Computing in BSD In-Reply-To: <199705161702.KAA17464@phaeton.artisoft.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 16 May 1997, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Or it may be that a 7 nodes, they meet the definition of Supercomputer > under DOE definitions, and are therefore on the munions list with PGP > and DES. I wonder if they have to drop the number of nodes, now that > we have 233MHz Intel processors... > Now that you mention this, with SMP you could have even a heavier system (don't tell this to the MOSIX guys :) ). Anyway, if they want to make a business out of clustering, it's OK with me, that's what the BSD license is all about. Pedro. > > Regards, > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. >