Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:14:13 -0700 From: Vizion <vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Bart Silverstrim <bsilver@chrononomicon.com> Subject: Re: postgrey question Message-ID: <200506021314.13723.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55C787E4-B2C1-452E-B0BE-797C864673F6@shire.net> References: <0a6397740f09ea4ac7cce0b1bead3bde@chrononomicon.com> <200506021303.21936.vizion@vizion.occoxmail.com> <55C787E4-B2C1-452E-B0BE-797C864673F6@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 02 June 2005 13:10, the author Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC contributed to the dialogue on- Re: postgrey question: >On Jun 2, 2005, at 2:03 PM, Vizion wrote: >> I do not know I buy that argument. The way I see it as a user of >> this list - >> it ain't broken as far as I am concerned and so I'd rather it not >> be fixed. >> My feeling is that you would be doing people a bigger favor by >> letting them >> sort out their own junk mail problem. It is not a listserver's job >> to fix it. >> It is up to the user/isp combination to fix. > >nobody was talking about the list or siggesting changing this or any >other list. This was a how to get postfix to do greylisting with >postgrey on freebsd question. I just brought up the point that >greylisting itself is not a panacea and works better in conjunction >with something like spam assassin to only grey list suspected spam. > Misunderstood you -- that what comes of replying without reading the whole of a long thread. Maybe I should make an omelette out of the egg on my face David -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner & Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing May/June bound for Europe via Panama Canal.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506021314.13723.vizion>