From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 25 23:00:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388161065678 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:00:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=pauls=30076e273@utdallas.edu) Received: from ip-relay-002.utdallas.edu (ip-relay-002.utdallas.edu [129.110.20.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029388FC1F for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:00:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=pauls=30076e273@utdallas.edu) X-Group: RELAYLIST X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,266,1233554400"; d="scan'208";a="7040414" Received: from smtp3.utdallas.edu ([129.110.20.110]) by ip-relay-002.utdallas.edu with ESMTP; 25 Feb 2009 16:31:47 -0600 Received: from utd65257.utdallas.edu (utd65257.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp3.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C57E85E1; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:31:44 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:31:44 +0000 From: Paul Schmehl To: Warren Block Message-ID: <7BEB43E737003AFA1ECEA232@utd65257.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: References: <591F97E51551F72295A54D9D@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <20090224223856.GA26057@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <200902242002.37106.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========2FC31F4B17530179D19D==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_7 != STABLE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:00:25 -0000 --==========2FC31F4B17530179D19D========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Wednesday, February 25, 2009 12:16:51 -0600 Warren Block=20 wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Paul Schmehl wrote: > >> --On Tuesday, February 24, 2009 23:02:36 -0600 Mel >> wrote: >>> >>> Presence of tag enables checkout mode, so it's not that you have a cvs repo >>> copy. Kernel date tag suggests a reboot, so the only thing that comes to >>> mind >>> is newvers.sh not having done it's job or UNAME_r set in env. >>> sysctl kern.osrelease also shows 7.1-PRERELEASE? >>> >> >> # sysctl kern.osrelease >> kern.osrelease: 7.1-PRERELEASE > > Something that might apply: your cvsup file showed cvsup12 as the > server. cvsup12 stopped responding for me several months ago. If your > csup and build is automated so you don't see the timeouts, that would > explain why you aren't getting updated. > Yes, that *would* explain it. I changed to cvsup1 the other day and csup'd=20 everything. I've started a new build just a few minutes ago. Should be=20 running the new kernel in a couple of hours. Thanks for your help, Warren. --=20 Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========2FC31F4B17530179D19D==========--