From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat May  9 11:19:31 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA08584
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sat, 9 May 1998 11:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA08578
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 9 May 1998 11:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
          by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA11364;
          Sat, 9 May 1998 11:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Message-Id: <199805091818.LAA11364@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>,
        Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ISA-PnP w\o BIOS support? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 09 May 1998 12:01:29 MDT."
             <199805091801.MAA19915@mt.sri.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 09 May 1998 11:18:52 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

You can include me as one of the ones that hates the linux interactive
process for generating a kernel and I am very glad that linux
has this and their lilo bootloader is right on the top of my
list for linux systems to must have 8)


	Amancio

> > > > This is (IMO) bogus.  Stuff set in the kernel configuration file is no 
> > > > easier to manipulate than sysctl variables.
> > > 
> > > Sure it is.  I know how things are setup in the kernel config files. I
> > 
> > Ah, so "easier" means "easier for me".  I think you'll find that most 
> > people consider an interactive configuration process a lot "easier" 
> > than having to install and build the kernel sources.
> 
> Actually no.  Most people are annoyed at the Linux 'interactive' process
> once they use the FreeBSD process.
> 
> I can give you boatloads of email that shows this.
> 
> 
> Nate
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message