From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 31 04:40:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86176B03 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:40:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BA69D1 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r0V4e0Ll032444 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:40:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r0V4e0t2032440; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:40:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:40:00 GMT Message-Id: <201301310440.r0V4e0t2032440@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: bin/105614: [patch] setkey(8): Creating NULL encryption ESP SAs with setkey fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eitan Adler List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 04:40:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/105614; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eitan Adler To: "John W. O'Brien" Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/105614: [patch] setkey(8): Creating NULL encryption ESP SAs with setkey fails Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:31:33 -0500 On 30 January 2013 19:42, John W. O'Brien wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I found today that this bug still exists in 9.1-STABLE r245089, and > that the suggested patch appears to fix it. > > If any further testing or analysis is needed prior to committing a > fix, I would be glad to help. > > CC: freebsd-net@ in the hopes of being noticed and adopted The patch is maleformed in the PR. Perhaps you could attach and resend? -- Eitan Adler