From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 2 17:45:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9D137B417 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 17:45:39 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id fB31jdC94388; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 17:45:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 17:45:39 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200112030145.fB31jdC94388@apollo.backplane.com> To: Lamont Granquist Cc: Richard Sharpe , Subject: Re: Patch #3 (TCP / Linux / Performance) References: <20011202172257.G1068-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :nice, 950 Mbs which should be the theoretical maximum. what kind of CPUs :do you have in there, and do you know how hard they were working? : These are 1.1 GHz duel Pentium III's. One of the cpu's is maxed out at that transfer rate (this is -stable and the program is in the system most of the time so...). That's where zero-copy would probably help. Of course, it's just a benchmark. It doesn't represent performance if one had to do *real* work on the data going over the link :-) -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message