From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Aug 23 17:53:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D3537B400; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 17:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.wrs.com (unknown-1-11.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA2543E3B; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 17:53:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Qing.Li@windriver.com) Received: from heavygear (qing4.isi.com [192.103.54.235]) by mail.wrs.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id RAA09181; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 17:53:24 -0700 (PDT) From: "Qing Li" To: "Nate Lawson" , Subject: RE: kern/41494: static routes set with interface address as gateway are Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 17:52:42 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200208240016.g7O0Gkvo081252@freefall.freebsd.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have sent a detailed description email to freebsd-net and freebsd-hackers before submitting the PR. I received only one reply. This behavior is by design but I believe it should be corrected. The analogy to my reasoning is ICMP redirect. I am not sure how to carry this discussion forward. Please advise. -- Qing > -----Original Message----- > From: Nate Lawson [mailto:njl@freebsd.org] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 5:17 PM > To: Qing.Li@windriver.com; njl@freebsd.org; freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: kern/41494: static routes set with interface address as > gateway are > > > Synopsis: static routes set with interface address as gateway are > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: njl > State-Changed-When: Fri Aug 23 17:14:38 PDT 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > Please discuss on freebsd-net to agree on proper behavior. If the > current behavior is by design, this PR can be closed. If not, a proper > patch should be built, following style(9) and fixing resource leaks. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=41494 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message