From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 12:46:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435141065674 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:46:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from mwi1.coffeenet.org (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBE88FC15 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:46:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=wo5JMCRUeOvUgx91oLFlhGn50gMt86bkpvMf0I6VfNI=; b=sSn9BUO5xaoGTstar7/fqTCPqLyqpbRzSLaH0zRj9GLFPNv6mxKNtCaYeqrc1S2DMAJMqPpbVvHZZTYstWFPy1KuvO/EoZZcEehg8zpKNjz/EUeWZ7crGWTEExxviH31; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by mwi1.coffeenet.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Qz6iI-000FVH-Ir for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:49:47 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.3) with esmtpsa id 1314881379-1948-1947/4/11; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:49:39 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <076DA148E8CBB414C3CC3DEB@HexaDeca64.dmpriest.net.uk> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 07:45:57 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <076DA148E8CBB414C3CC3DEB@HexaDeca64.dmpriest.net.uk> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.0 Subject: Re: Using underlying adX devices as well as ar0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:46:06 -0000 On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:28:37 -0500, Karl Pielorz wrote: > Is it OK to run smartmontools / smartd / smartctl against the underlying > adX devices, whilst ar0 is in use? Yes. :-)