Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 23:02:44 -0500 (EST) From: Patrick Seal <patseal@hyperhost.net> To: genght@cn.ibm.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE box more slow than slackware3.5 box? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902092301560.8881-100000@foobar.hyperhost.net> In-Reply-To: <48256714.00124BCC.00@cn.ibm.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
check you host* files in /etc (esp. hosts.equiv and resolv.conf) ------------------------------------ _____________________________________ Patrick Seal |"Microsoft isn't evil, they just make <patseal@hyperhost.net> | really crappy operating systems." Hyperhost - http://www.hyperhost.net| -Linus Torvalds hosting and Design http://www.freebsd.org - http://www.linux.org On Wed, 10 Feb 1999 genght@cn.ibm.com wrote: > Dear all, > > I have two boxes that have the same hardware.One is FreeBSD2.2.8-RELEASE > and the other is Slackware3.5. > They are using the same Intel 10/100 NIC and attaching to the same 10/100 > Bay 450T switch.But when I ftp/telnet to my FreeBSD box(either from win95 > client or from linux client),it responded after a very very long time (I > think it is dead,but not.)But the linux box work perfectly. > Why? Does FreeBSD2.2.8-RELEASE have some faults when handing the 100M > ethernet? > I so love FreeBSD, I am not willing hear that FreeBSD is worse than > slackware. > > Some one can help me?Any advice is welcome. > > Thanks in advance. > > Regards, > > Haotao Geng > E_mail:genght@cn.ibm.com > Tel: 86 755 6639841x186 Fax: 86 755 6639840 > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9902092301560.8881-100000>