Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Feb 1998 10:51:57 -0800 (PST)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>
To:        Peter Lennon <pl2@balernochs.edin.sch.uk>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: de0 and half duplex
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980218105011.13646N-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
In-Reply-To: <l03110701b10faedf2064@[195.188.194.38]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Peter Lennon wrote:

> Before I say anything else - thanks for FreeBSD - I don't see it said
> nearly often enough in the lists.  It made our whole-school access to the
> Internet possible.

Excellent!  :)
> 
> I have a Pentium 133 box just upgraded to 2.2.5-RELEASE, with an SMC 10/100
> PCI Etherpower card.  I also have a switch with two 100mbps ports which
> only do half duplex (FYI, USR TotalSwitch, and they stopped developing it
> before they had the software fixed to do full duplex, grrrr.)

Odd..

> Reading between the lines in "man de" I put
> 
> ifconfig_de0="inet 195.188.194.2 media 100baseTX -mediaopt full-duplex
                                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^
Your hub must support FDX if you're going to use it.  This forces the idea
so there's no fallback.  Take that out and you should be happy.

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980218105011.13646N-100000>