From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat Apr 23 04:17:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619F4B19574 for ; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 04:17:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BE818B2; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 04:17:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A15A115D; Sat, 23 Apr 2016 04:17:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 04:17:42 +0000 From: Glen Barber To: Lyndon Nerenberg Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why 100 packages are evil Message-ID: <20160423041742.GD1804@FreeBSD.org> References: <5716FA70.4080604@freebsd.org> <57170E5D.1090701@freebsd.org> <5524F499-5042-407E-9180-43D15A53F3F0@FreeBSD.org> <7621BDAB-A409-456A-A3F1-A6CD9B371DBC@rdsor.ro> <20160420094806.GJ6614@zxy.spb.ru> <7c84f388-21dc-419f-70ce-c5369e294dab@freebsd.org> <20160423032138.GB1804@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="at6+YcpfzWZg/htY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 X-SCUD-Definition: Sudden Completely Unexpected Dataloss X-SULE-Definition: Sudden Unexpected Learning Event X-PEKBAC-Definition: Problem Exists, Keyboard Between Admin/Computer User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 04:17:43 -0000 --at6+YcpfzWZg/htY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:41:06PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > But the dependency base will be huge. Yet you fail to explain how. > Right now I can count on a very limited set of dependencies for > anything I ship as a 3rd party package. How is this different than the existing model? What do you think happens to everything that depends on OpenSSL when an SA is issued? Glen --at6+YcpfzWZg/htY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXGvdmAAoJEAMUWKVHj+KTJ8kP/iotqW/7Qjg6Zyq98p0UmBRG WzMNg+xr274PVe2Zlu8hvQsR7hWfCcRyt3qqg738PGUV5Xg6LoF4JyB10oRnSPPA 0gWK8tWi1PYvZ5FbQjymNB0NaSNHKfUXV7UY8TAVvDvDkGSflLJ51OCOWNImeRLw hF5g+5LwdjB17BeQ6QEjlgILu2cJazaxgEgzSZMyHde84gP2CLMQqNs6mqS7ANn5 oHKK6a8tWg9II4Sb+AhWBsmMZnye1VqRmxHM/fdHf1fVoal1qZDaQaWYUtsnvOdx Qjlc6W0uBxqdsi1dHm2DtSpQ2Pzs8iqJlHUrXt5Wtpl/f7k58w5GPDJAUHvAR/d2 gjkejiz/2A1bfJEMwlkwYGBdQsNQjdihWiLj/tY5KlQN9VpTZhH8YXnaEN3s/RV9 0mKAAZgezw0DfNrtG+Sm8tNZVzKU6ucN6Xnj1yDjMONTOKflE7liPORUmAhZCuNh I9GbZ3Z00ch0pCFONe76PcEPEL1ykvOsMo9F2AyVogj3j0/SP+/VGBEzTMglkhZ7 KY6+sTdGqtovxgrdHSs+o2+4w3Vz8OtfulcqeFeNLV9suRlEGPhtnM2NUFpzB1H6 VEgfQYH2JBJ0fP2SBnwSeF5RZ+qrktbOV1slzm1tuagdW5hJVtXXOjuYJql70JAn wATwlO/MEqQJxzgGmrih =p/1q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --at6+YcpfzWZg/htY--