From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Nov  8 17:49:13 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA05925
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 8 Nov 1997 17:49:13 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from kithrup.com (kithrup.com [205.179.156.40])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA05918
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 8 Nov 1997 17:49:10 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from sef@kithrup.com)
Received: (from sef@localhost)
	by kithrup.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA09619
	for hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 8 Nov 1997 17:49:09 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sef)
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 1997 17:49:09 -0800 (PST)
From: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@kithrup.com>
Message-Id: <199711090149.RAA09619@kithrup.com>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Newest Pentium bug (fatal)
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I just got more mail from Robert Collins, who spoke with Intel yesterday
and today.

He says that Intel did not know about the bug until yesterday, and that
it has never been fixed in any revision of the processor.

Meanwhile, various news sources are picking up the story. ;)