From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 10 18:44:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B0A16A41C; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:44:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com) Received: from www.portaone.com (support.portaone.com [195.70.151.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E688643D1D; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:44:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com) Received: from [192.168.0.49] (2-zyx-piter-f0285.r5.ll.kw.ua [195.140.246.50]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.portaone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5AIALoG089241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:10:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sobomax@portaone.com) Message-ID: <42A9D78B.1000002@portaone.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:10:19 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Porta Software Ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garance A Drosihn References: <200504132122.j3DLMKHa089226@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/922/Fri Jun 10 15:58:19 2005 on www.portaone.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, Poul-Henning Kamp , cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/tools/tools/nanobsd ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Maxim.Sobolev@portaone.com List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 18:44:52 -0000 Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Back on April 13/2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> >> Modified files: >> tools/tools/nanobsd make.conf >> Log: >> sort and expand the prunelist in a more or less generally sensibly >> order. Put some strategic comments in about how much storage is >> necessary and a longer explanation on the top. >> >> It is now pretty trivial to put nanoBSD on as little as a 64MB >> CF card. > > > Are any macros defined (-D) in CFLAGS when building for nanoBSD, > or other "please make a smaller system" situations? ISTR some > value to check via #ifdef, but now I can't remember what it was > or where I saw it used. IMHO this would be impractical due to likely inter-dependency problems. Practical approach for building "stripped" system is to build normal world, install it and them remove everything you don't need (for example includes, static libs, /rescue etc). -Maxim