From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 24 12:57:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F22116A401 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:57:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768F443D48 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:57:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2OCvEDd093733; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:57:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10]) by localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30813-01; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:56:56 +0200 (EET) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2OCu5ST093685 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:56:05 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) id k2OCuTuQ063654; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:56:29 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:56:28 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov Message-ID: <20060324125628.GA63626@ip.net.ua> References: <200603221611.k2MGBV21010114@freefall.freebsd.org> <20060323103739.X90993@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060323103739.X90993@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ip.net.ua Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:13.sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:57:21 -0000 --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 10:44:05AM +0200, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: >=20 > Hello! >=20 > On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote: > > Path > >- ----------------------------------------------------------------------= --- > >RELENG_4 > > src/contrib/sendmail/libsm/fflush.c 1.1.1.1.2.1 > > src/contrib/sendmail/libsm/local.h 1.1.1.1.2.6 > > src/contrib/sendmail/libsm/refill.c 1.1.1.1.2.4 >=20 > This doesn't change sendmail's identification string - it's still "8.13.= 1" > on RELENG_4_11, which makes detection of unpatched systems more difficult > to sysadmin. Wouldn't be wise to add, say, "-p1" to this string in=20 > version.c? >=20 It depends on what you think about whether it's good or not that it's undetectable. I prefer it to be not-detectable. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEI+x8qRfpzJluFF4RAmeTAJ4kDYvXvT3x7SFUtrLuqQy2k1rptgCeIPsf 0hFYRIGSfp/JsFh7OQmjy5w= =K9m+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2--