From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 17 19:53:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A7916A4CF for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:53:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD5643D1D for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:53:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dodell@sitetronics.com) Received: from gibsonnet.demon.nl ([82.161.57.57]:19613 helo=[192.168.1.19]) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C8OnH-000FYz-Ew; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:53:19 +0000 Message-ID: <414B40B0.5030809@sitetronics.com> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:53:20 +0200 From: "Devon H. O'Dell" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garance A Drosihn References: <16715.4611.108597.354107@piglet.timing.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: diff(1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:53:21 -0000 Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 10:34 AM -0600 9/17/04, Ben Mesander wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've recently done a port of OpenBSD diff(1) to FreeBSD for >> licensing reasons (the diff(1) in base FreeBSD is GPL licensed), >> OpenBSD has a BSD-style license). >> >> I was going to work with Warner to see if I could get this into >> the ports collection. But we were also curious to see if other >> people thought it might be OK to replace the GNU diff in base >> with the OpenBSD diff. > > > I think that FreeBSD should prefer BSD-licensed utilities whenever > they are available and work well enough. (and when they have all > the features that people are used to for that utility). Assuming > OpenBSD's diff does the job, I'm all for having us switch to it. > It makes more sense for gnu's diff to be the version that ends up > available as a port. Does OpenBSD's diffutils include sdiff? If not, this will be broken. --Devon