From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 8 18:11:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60736106564A; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:11:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF508FC0A; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 18:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qadz30 with SMTP id z30so4430685qad.13 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 11:11:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=PgpKCJsrPF6HcWNGeE/1NWddCDUDfjJPs9yaGZalbE8=; b=Q3zpFyPOKxGKb5Z1d3aild6RiQ8hZunE9HapyTXp7TB6JIn74P5tUWqPU7W7cyf6xs CkIvoMAP6gT5yopqTfzIswn3p/xb9fdwoJeL0hG7WefEfS1HRQGwoEbCmcInQHCDIQtK R498Y/FUDrq90pdclewi5YdGGqsSgNEsHV1DU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.213.10 with SMTP id gu10mr5839789qab.33.1318097474169; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 11:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.74.82 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 11:11:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <52963.1318092760@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 11:11:13 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Arnaud Lacombe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Warren Block , Glen Barber , Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Benjamin Kaduk Subject: Re: aliasing (or renaming) kern.geom.debugflags X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 18:11:15 -0000 On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message >> , Arnaud Lacombe writes: >> >>>User do not care to understand the meaning of an option, you leave a >>>hole somewhere, it will be used. I'm not even speaking about security >>>issue here... >> >> There is a big difference between having an emergency hatch that >> gives you a chance to escape certain death by running across a >> shooting range, and on posting a sign telling people to use it as >> a short-cut. >> > I will certainly never ask you to draw blueprints for a shooting > range. There is NO legitimacy whatsoever for an emergency hatch to > pass though the firing line. Certain groups do use this emergency hatch in production to get past safeguards and purposely zero out disks. Granted, it's an ill-advised procedure for most end-users. Thanks, -Garrett