From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat May 3 06:45:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA29032 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 3 May 1997 06:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mixcom.mixcom.com (mixcom.mixcom.com [198.137.186.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA29027 for ; Sat, 3 May 1997 06:45:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mixcom.mixcom.com (8.6.12/2.2) id IAA02526; Sat, 3 May 1997 08:48:20 -0500 Received: from p75.mixcom.com(198.137.186.25) by mixcom.mixcom.com via smap (V1.3) id sma002500; Sat May 3 08:48:02 1997 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970503084731.00c08d2c@mixcom.com> X-Sender: sysop@mixcom.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Sat, 03 May 1997 08:47:31 -0500 To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: SPAM target Cc: Adrian Chadd , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 08:35 PM 5/3/97 +1000, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: >Many do. That's why src host should be randomly "real". I saw one spammer keep hitting us from different relays, sat back, and decided that I'd saved myself a few hundred bounce mails. >> Problem is Linux DOES have some interesting (development) anti-DoS code >> (someone have a look at the 2.0.30 kernel, or the ISS patches to 2.0.29). > >Who cares about Linux? Forget the host, just saturate their link, and >stop people reading their web pages. Tie the T1(s) into the high tension wires... is their equipment 230K compatable? >Another target is ispam.net. That's cyberpromo too! Other CP sites: answerme.com keepmailing.com massemail.com outgoing.com spamford.com Anyone know if you can query the NIC and see what domains are tied to a specific nameserver? ------------------------------------------- Jeff Mountin - System/Network Administrator jeff@mixcom.net MIX Communications Serving the Internet since 1990