From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Apr 30 12:44:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from kachina.som.siu.edu (kachina.som.siu.edu [131.230.167.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FABA1554E for ; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 12:44:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from parrothd@midwest.net) Received: from tlingle (webct.som.siu.edu [131.230.167.194]) by kachina.som.siu.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA00380; Fri, 30 Apr 1999 14:43:58 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199904301943.OAA00380@kachina.som.siu.edu> X-Sender: parrothd@mail.midwest.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 14:48:36 -0500 To: dan@dpcsys.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Jonathan E. Lyons" Subject: Re: named In-Reply-To: References: <199904300205.VAA28662@cdale3.midwest.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Nope, it's a fresh install of 3.1, except for the PAO kernel, but now that I think about it making PAO made changes to rc.conf, and I probably saw the named.boot entre and ftped named.boot from my 2.2.7 machine think they were runnning the same versions of named. At least now named is running... :) Thanks.. >No. Did you do an upgrade to 3.1? On a fresh install there is >no /etc/rc.conf, just a /etc/defaults/rc.conf and it does not >refer to named.boot. > >Dan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message