Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 09:38:55 -0500 From: "Daniel M. Eischen" <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@chomsky.Pinyon.ORG>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threads models and FreeBSD. (Next Step) Message-ID: <38258EFF.399F9D5F@vigrid.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911070237440.10573-100000@current1.whistle.com> <38258BFA.B7EA3ECB@vigrid.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel M. Eischen" wrote:
>
> Except for very narrow windows where threads holding critical resources
> (internal to the threads library) are continued until they release the
> resource. I can also see the need for threads to cross scheduling group
> boundaries in order to support priority protection and priority ceiling
^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
Eek! These are one and the same. I meant priority _inheritence_ and
priority protection mutexes.
Dan Eischen
eischen@vigrid.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38258EFF.399F9D5F>